Skip to main content
· 9/15/2000

United States v. John Egge

Citations

  • 223 F.3d 1128
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10263
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7739
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23277
  • 2000 WL 1299743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that extrinsic corroborating evidence support the hearsay statements
  • \ Section 3B1.1 attempts to apportion relative responsibility where an offense involves multiple participants ....\ (emphasis added)
  • “In making factual determinations, a sentencing judge is generally not restricted to evidence that would be admissible at trial.”
  • “Section 3B1.1 attempts to apportion relative responsibility where an offense involves multiple participants . . . .” (emphasis added)
  • “Section 3B1.1 attempts to apportion relative responsibility where an offense involves multiple participants . . . .” (emphasis added)
  • three-level adjustment was proper where defendant used others to help him sell drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Hall, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.