Skip to main content
· 11/19/2010

Montgomery v. American Airlines, Inc.

Citations

  • 626 F.3d 382
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23801
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,037
  • 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1345
  • 2010 WL 4670173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employer liability for coworker harassment requires that the employer be “negligent in dis- covering or remedying harassment”
  • holding that a crew chief’s “occasional au- thority to oversee some aspects” of Montgomery’s work as a mechanic did not render him a Title VII supervisor
  • explaining that testimony must be based on personal knowledge and “mere conclusory allegations do not constitute evidence”
  • finding insufficient notice where complaints were too vague to put plaintiff on notice of racial harassment
  • finding it unreasonable for plaintiff to believe that his crew chief was “the type of employee who could be expected to convey [his] complaints to someone who could stop the harassment” (quotations omitted)
  • finding evidence that racial harassment from coworkers does not “constitute evidence allowing a jury to infer a ‘discriminatory motive behind [plaintiffs] demotion.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Bauer, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.