Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 6/4/2009

United States v. Hosking

Citations

  • 567 F.3d 329
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 11955
  • 2009 WL 1544446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that restitution included the value of “[t]he time and effort spent by the bank’s employees and outside professionals in unraveling the twelve-year embezzlement scheme”
  • holding that restitution included the value of “[t]he time and effort spent by the bank’s employees and outside professionals in unraveling the twelve-year embezzlement scheme”
  • holding that a sentencing court “may order a lump-sum payment from [a retirement] account to satisfy a restitution order”
  • the district court is required to base its restitution order, to the extent practicable, on a complete accounting of the loss
  • collecting cases from Sixth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Flaum and Rovner, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.