United States v. Hosking

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restitution included the value of “[t]he time and effort spent by the bank’s employees and outside professionals in unraveling the twelve-year embezzlement scheme”
• holding that restitution included the value of “[t]he time and effort spent by the bank’s employees and outside professionals in unraveling the twelve-year embezzlement scheme”
• holding that a sentencing court “may order a lump-sum payment from [a retirement] account to satisfy a restitution order”
• the district court is required to base its restitution order, to the extent practicable, on a complete accounting of the loss
• collecting cases from Sixth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).