United States v. Patricia A. Havens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restitution under the MVRA for identity-fraud victim could include “[f]ees paid to counsel or other experts for dealing with the banks and credit agencies in the effort to correct her credit history and 16 repair the damage to her credit rating”
• upholding inclusion of attorney fees “paid [by an identity fraud victim] to counsel or other experts for dealing with the banks and credit agencies in the effort to correct her credit history and repair the damage to her credit rating” in the restitution order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).