Skip to main content
· 4/25/2005

United States v. Walter Kevin Scott

Citations

  • 405 F.3d 615
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7507
  • 2005 WL 949040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the expense of an audit conducted to determine how much was stolen is recoverable
  • holding that the expense of an audit conducted to deter- mine how much was stolen is recoverable
  • “[T]he amount of criminal restitution is determined by the judge, whereas a suit for damages is a suit at law within the [Seventh] [A]mend- ment’s meaning.”
  • “The line between criminal restitution and common law damages is important to maintain.”
  • “An incorrect application of the guidelines requires resentencing under the post-Booker sentencing regime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.