· 7/29/2014

United States v. William Marr

Citations

760 F.3d 733
94 Fed. R. Serv. 1462
2014 WL 3720256
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“A terse motion in limine is not specific enough to meet the requirements of Fed. R. Evid 103(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.