United States v. Stefan Irving

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the only property exempt from [§ 3613(a)] is that which the government could not reach for the payment of federal income taxes”
• concluding that the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a), 15 constituted an exception to ERISA’s anti-alienation provision
• concluding that the validity of a border search does not depend on the motive for the search
• noting that a defendant’s “confession, if proven reliable, may 22 serve as the only evidence reaching the corpus delicti”
• noting that searches of vessels by customs officials are most analogous to border searches
• noting that searches of vessels by customs officials are most analogous to border searches

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).