Skip to main content
· 9/14/2012

United States v. Benjamin Robers

Citations

  • 698 F.3d 937
  • 2012 WL 4039763
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting the inclusion in the restitution award of line-item expenses like property taxes, insurance, and accrued interest
  • “[R]eal property is not liquid and, absent a huge price discount, cannot be sold immediately”
  • “The declining [real estate] market only became an issue because of [the defendant’s] fraud,” and thus, the defendant, “not his victims, should bear the risk of market forces beyond his control.”
  • de novo review of legality of restitution order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Manion, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.