· 9/14/2012
United States v. Benjamin Robers
Citations
- 698 F.3d 937
- 2012 WL 4039763
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting the inclusion in the restitution award of line-item expenses like property taxes, insurance, and accrued interest
- “[R]eal property is not liquid and, absent a huge price discount, cannot be sold immediately”
- “The declining [real estate] market only became an issue because of [the defendant’s] fraud,” and thus, the defendant, “not his victims, should bear the risk of market forces beyond his control.”
- de novo review of legality of restitution order
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Manion, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.