Skip to main content
· 8/21/2014

United States v. James Scalzo

Citations

  • 764 F.3d 739
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16248
  • 2014 WL 4100900

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “But having admitted the facts in the Information through his plea agreement and through his answers to the court during his change-of-plea colloquy, Scalzo may not now deny them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rovner, Williams, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.