United States v. Gentles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice from improper remarks \because this is not a close case and there is no likelihood that the remarks could have affected its outcome\ where there was an \abundance of independent evidence\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “It is a well established tenet of our judicial system that juries are presumed to follow ... instructions [given during the closing charge].”
• \It is a well established tenet of our judicial system that juries are presumed to follow [the court's] instructions.\
• \juries are presumed to follow [the court's] instructions\
• prosecutor’s misconduct in closing arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).