First Circuit· 9/2/2010
United States v. Gentles
Citations
- 619 F.3d 75
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18348
- 2010 WL 3432793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no prejudice from improper remarks \because this is not a close case and there is no likelihood that the remarks could have affected its outcome\ where there was an \abundance of independent evidence\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “It is a well established tenet of our judicial system that juries are presumed to follow ... instructions [given during the closing charge].”
- \It is a well established tenet of our judicial system that juries are presumed to follow [the court's] instructions.\
- \juries are presumed to follow [the court's] instructions\
- prosecutor’s misconduct in closing arguments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Selya, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ayala-VazquezFirst Circuit· 2014-05-02· cited 141×
- United States v. BerriosThird Circuit· 2012-04-10· cited 137×
- State v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-11-27· cited 116×
- United States v. BrownFirst Circuit· 2012-01-19· cited 108×
- United States v. BretonFirst Circuit· 2014-01-06· cited 81×
- United States v. JadloweFirst Circuit· 2010-12-03· cited 71×
- United States v. DancyFirst Circuit· 2011-04-13· cited 70×
- United States v. RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2012-03-28· cited 58×
- United States v. Espinal-AlmeidaFirst Circuit· 2012-11-14· cited 56×
- United States v. DoeFirst Circuit· 2013-12-20· cited 50×
- United States v. BainFirst Circuit· 2017-10-13· cited 47×
- United States v. Vidal-MaldonadoFirst Circuit· 2013-11-22· cited 40×
- United States v. ManorFirst Circuit· 2011-01-25· cited 30×
- United States v. Diaz-CastroFirst Circuit· 2014-05-23· cited 27×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-05-03· cited 26×
- United States v. CuretFirst Circuit· 2011-04-13· cited 24×
- West v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2011-01-26· cited 23×
- United States v. Vicente-AriasFirst Circuit· 2015-10-14· cited 23×
- United States v. Rivera-RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2014-08-04· cited 20×
- United States v. CaddenFirst Circuit· 2020-07-09· cited 20×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 3,379×
- United States v. SepulvedaFirst Circuit· 1993-12-20· cited 733×
- United States v. DuarteFirst Circuit· 2001-04-23· cited 452×
- United States v. MartinFirst Circuit· 2008-03-21· cited 412×
- United States v. TaylorFirst Circuit· 1995-05-17· cited 264×
- United States v. Perez-RuizFirst Circuit· 2003-12-22· cited 182×
- United States v. VaroudakisFirst Circuit· 2000-12-06· cited 148×
- United States v. DeCologeroFirst Circuit· 2008-06-23· cited 145×
- United States v. DixonFirst Circuit· 2006-05-26· cited 142×
- United States v. Dávila-GonzálezFirst Circuit· 2010-02-10· cited 135×
- United States v. Martha Mejia-LozanoFirst Circuit· 1987-09-23· cited 129×
- United States v. ProcopioFirst Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 108×
- United States v. PolitanoFirst Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 87×
- United States v. Luis Raul Rivera-GomezFirst Circuit· 1995-10-12· cited 83×
- United States v. FrankhauserFirst Circuit· 1996-04-09· cited 81×
- United States v. Steven LynnFirst Circuit· 1988-09-13· cited 72×
- United States v. HansenFirst Circuit· 2006-01-13· cited 71×
- United States v. Vazquez-BotetFirst Circuit· 2008-07-09· cited 71×
- United States v. Ricardo Torres-Galindo, A/K/A Ricky Silva, United States v. Ricardo L. Guilbe-Sanchez, A/K/A Richard La SombraFirst Circuit· 2000-03-22· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.