United States v. Diaz-Castro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rosemond clarified that a defendant needs \advance -13- knowledge\ of the elements of an offense to be convicted as an aider and abettor
• rejecting defendant’s claim that he was unable to withdraw because there was no record evidence of any effort to withdraw and the video showed defendant enjoying himself
• rejecting defendant's claim that he was unable to withdraw because there was no record evidence of any effort to withdraw and the video showed defendant enjoying himself
• reviewing for abuse of discretion the exclusion of evidence offered to support the asserted affirmative defenses, including duress, and reviewing de novo the refusal to give the requested jury instruction
• evidence of dealings with fake drugs was sufficient to uphold a conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).