United States v. DeCologero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the ADAAG 18 “lay[s] out the technical structural requirements of 19 places of public accommodation . . . .”
• discussing courts' reliance on Fed. R. Evid. 403 versus courts' inherent authority when considering propriety of imposition of time limits
• “[P]retrial orders that have the practical effect of excluding material evidence at trial are appealable under section 3731, regardless of nomenclature.”
• “Every circuit to have examined the issue has agreed that double jeopardy only bars successive RICO charges involving both the same enterprise and the same pattern of racketeering activity.”
• “[e]very circuit to have examined the issue has agreed 4 that double jeopardy only bars successive RICO charges involving both the same enterprise and the same pattern of racketeering activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).