United States v. Steven Lynn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disagreeing that evidence of an act involving the same illicit substance as the one charged, but six years earlier, had special relevance
• noting that the “laundry list of admissible 14 purposes for evidence of prior bad acts” contained in Rule 404(b)(2) “is not exhaustive.”
• noting that the “laundry list of admissible purposes for evidence of prior bad acts’ contained in Rule 404(b)(2) “is not exhaustive”
• noting that ____ six year period between the prior conviction and the instant offense significantly diminishes the probative value of the prior conviction
• noting that six year period between the prior conviction and the instant offense significantly diminishes the probative value of the prior conviction
• noting that the “‘laundry list’ of admissible purposes for evidence of prior bad acts” contained in Rule 404(b)(2) “is not exhaustive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).