United States v. Breton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Pinholster did not bar petitioner from presenting 6 new evidence to support a cause-and-prejudice argument under Martinez because 7 Pinholster applies only to claims previously “adjudicated on the merits in State court 8 proceedings”
• explaining that the 19 court must consider the entire record as a whole to determine whether substantial 20 evidence exists
• recognizing \the low bar of relevancy set out in Rule 401\
• recognizing “the low bar of relevancy set out in Rule 401”
• noting that a \history of visits to websites with a child pornography connection or use of search terms associated with child pornography can support a finding that the defendant knew the images he retrieved contained child pornography\
• extending the offense-committed-against-the-spouse exception to the marital communications privilege for an offense against a child of either spouse to promote marital and family harmony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).