First Circuit· 7/9/1996
United States v. Procopio
Citations
- 88 F.3d 21
- 45 Fed. R. Serv. 142
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16290
- 1996 WL 369378
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding sufficient corroboration to support probable cause despite the fact that informant’s tip contained multi-level hearsay
- applying the good faith exception to an affidavit in which the “only omission was the failure to explain how the agent . . . knew that ‘81 Intervale’ was ‘Kiley’s address’”
- “Whether or not this is a defect in the application, it is hardly blatant, nor is there any suggestion (or basis for a suggestion) or actual bad faith.”
- intent evidence—uncharged misconduct evidence two years after the charged misconduct
- rejecting all of Kiley’s grounds for appeal
- “against Kiley, the evidence was strong”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Selya, Cyr, Boudin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court· 1998-07-28· cited 478×
- United States v. Christopher FrazierSixth Circuit· 2005-09-06· cited 237×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2008-01-16· cited 173×
- United States v. Corey MartinEleventh Circuit· 2002-07-18· cited 171×
- United States v. John Van Shutters, IISixth Circuit· 1998-12-10· cited 166×
- Wilson v. SirmonsTenth Circuit· 2008-08-08· cited 147×
- United States v. OwensFirst Circuit· 1999-03-02· cited 116×
- State v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2012-11-27· cited 116×
- United States v. Zayas-DiazFirst Circuit· 1996-09-09· cited 101×
- United States v. MeadeFirst Circuit· 1997-04-08· cited 93×
- United States v. SheaFirst Circuit· 2000-05-03· cited 71×
- United States v. RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2012-03-28· cited 58×
- United States v. RobinsonFirst Circuit· 2007-01-11· cited 57×
- United States v. TseFirst Circuit· 2004-07-21· cited 51×
- United States v. VigneauFirst Circuit· 1999-07-22· cited 50×
- United States v. RogersFirst Circuit· 1996-12-24· cited 49×
- United States v. GentlesFirst Circuit· 2010-09-02· cited 46×
- United States v. Rodriguez-SolerFirst Circuit· 2014-12-03· cited 46×
- Braxton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-06· cited 43×
- United States v. Morla-TrinidadFirst Circuit· 1996-11-08· cited 41×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,010×
- United States v. DavidFirst Circuit· 1991-07-29· cited 214×
- St. Joseph Hospital v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 177×
- United States v. Steven RicciardelliFirst Circuit· 1993-06-22· cited 146×
- United States v. Luis A. AguirreFirst Circuit· 1988-02-16· cited 135×
- United States v. WihbeyFirst Circuit· 1996-02-06· cited 121×
- United States v. ManningFirst Circuit· 1996-03-21· cited 111×
- United States v. Infante-RuizFirst Circuit· 1994-01-25· cited 107×
- United States v. Bernard Michael McLaughlin United States of America v. David Carl BruceFirst Circuit· 1992-02-18· cited 106×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.