United States v. Vicente-Arias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant was \not entitled to the same sentence as [his codefendant]\ in part because the co-defendant \received a minor role reduction and [the defendant] did not\
• finding no error where \prosecutor's improper statement was isolated and not deliberate\
• “We agree with the district court that plaintiffs seek to enforce defendants’ own rules promulgated under the Exchange Act.”
• “‘[f]or expert testimony to be admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 702, it must “be relevant to the task at hand” and helpful to the jury in its deliberations’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).