United States v. Daniel Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding enhancement applies “when a defendant uses the premises for the purpose of substantial drug-trafficking activities, even if the premises was also her family home at the times in question”
• vacating sentence because the district court’s only rationale for including a drug quantity in its calculation was that the defendant had been convicted of conspiracy and therefore “should be charged with the entire amount of those drugs” linked to the conspiracy
• clear error review; premises enhancement applied where premises was also defendant’s family home
• elements of aiding and abetting distribution of controlled substance
• reviewing this finding for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).