United States v. Robin Brooks, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that photographs and a video showing the defendant posing with a gun were intrinsic, where the gun appeared to be the same gun used in the charged crimes
• holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in taking judicial notice of \accuracy and reliability of GPS technology.\
• holding GPS records were properly admitted under the business records exception where executive of security company testified that “company routinely keeps the GPS data on the company server”
• holding cell-phone videos and photos of defendant were intrinsic because they showed the cell phone belonged to defendant, linking him to the stolen vehicle where the cell phone was found
• finding that admission of cell phone photos and videos of defendant posing with firearm were admissible as evidence intrinsic to charges, including possession of a firearm by a convicted felon
• affirming district court’s taking judicial notice of “the accuracy and reliability of GPS technology,” and thus allowing GPS evidence without expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).