United States v. Randall Rogers, United States of America v. Scott J. Philipp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a letter from a codefendant which exculpated the defendant was not newly discovered evidence because the codefendant “maintained his silence during the trial and submitted [the] letter only as a post-trial statement”
• remanding for findings regarding whether entire amount of drugs attributable to conspiracy were foreseeable to defendant
• the co-defendant, who later provided exculpatory evidence, “maintained his silence during the trial and submitted this letter only as a post-trial statement”
• the witness proffering exculpatory evidence post-trial sat silent during the trial in which the defendant was convicted
• defendant claimed as newly discovered evidence a letter from a co-defendant available to him throughout the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).