United States v. Curtis Bell, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the de novo versus clear error split
• “Living in a residence and cooking drugs in it can both be relevant purposes under the guideline. . . . [P]recedents under the guideline do not carve out residences as safe havens from being drug-production premises.”
• “Drug storage on the property and transactions on the property will usually suffice [to establish primary use.]”
• “Drug storage on the property and transactions on the property will usually suffice [to establish primary use.]”
• “Drug storage on the property and transactions on the property will usually suffice [to establish primary use.]”
• “Drug storage on the property and transactions on the property will usually suffice [to establish primary use.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).