Skip to main content
· 5/17/2013

United States v. Aaron Polk

Citations

  • 715 F.3d 238
  • 2013 WL 2120814
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no Confrontation -9- Clause violation where district court limited cross-examination to exclude statement of “marginal relevance” with “potential prejudice,” and defendant’s counsel cross examined witness about other topic bearing on his truthfulness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Beam, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.