United States v. Edward Jefferson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is within the province of the jury to make credibility assessments and resolve conflicting testimony.” (citation omitted)
• “We have repeatedly upheld jury verdicts based solely on the testimony of co-conspirators and cooperating witnesses.... ” (quoting United States v. Coleman, 525 F.3d 665, 666 (8th Cir. 2008))
• “ We have repeatedly upheld jury verdicts based solely on the testimony of co-conspirators and cooperating witnesses, noting that it is within the province of the jury to make credibility assessments and resolve conflicting testimony.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).