United States v. Huggans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an indictment for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance provides “‘specific facts constituting the offense’ if it apprises the defendant of the time frame of the alleged drug conspiracy and the type of drugs involved” (citation omitted)
• explaining that an indictment sufficiently delineates facts that would establish the charged offense when it provides a time frame for the alleged illegal acts and, in a case involving illegal substances, delineates what substances are involved
• upholding a similar conspiracy indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).