United States v. Daniel A. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting how “aggressively” the district court acted to cure the error
• noting how \aggressively\ the district court acted to cure the error
• “[Substantial evidence of guilt can lead to a finding that the allegedly improper testimony was harmless.”
• “The admission of allegedly prejudicial testimony is ordinarily cured by an instruction to the jury to disregard the testimony.”
• \[S]ubstantial evidence of guilt can lead to a finding that the allegedly improper testimony was harmless.\
• \The admission of allegedly prejudicial testimony is ordinarily cured by an instruction to the jury to disregard the testimony.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).