United States v. Joshua A. Waldman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming finding of specific intent to cause death or serious bodily harm based on defendant threatening and aiming a gun at victim
• applying plain error review where an expert witness testified to the defendant’s intent, the court sustained defense counsel’s objection and gave curative instructions, and defense counsel did not move for mistrial
• where there was substantial evidence of intent and a curative jury instruction, violation of 704(b) by -16- expert did not amount to plain error
• where there was substantial evidence of guilt, no plain 40 United States v. Diaz, No. 02-0513/AR error for expert to opine that accused “had an intent to kill a policeman.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).