Skip to main content
· 6/28/1989

United States v. James Edward Whitfield

Citations

  • 874 F.2d 591
  • 1989 WL 50278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A successor judge need only familiarize himself with the evidence and legal issues involved and exercise informed discretion in imposing sentence.”
  • “A defendant’s due process rights are not infringed by the reassignment of a case pursuant to Rule 25(b) following a finding or verdict of guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Gibson, Timbers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.