United States v. Daniel Harmon, Jr., and Roger C. Walls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that U.S.S.G. § 2C1.1 was properly applied to defendants who “extorted money from individuals by soliciting monetary payments in exchange for not prosecuting them for crimes for which they otherwise would have been prosecuted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).