United States v. Shannon Wayne Agofsky, United States of America v. Joseph Anthony Agofsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \an alibi instruction would not have been appropriate\ where the government offered \both direct participation and accessory theories\ explaining that a conviction may be based on \aiding and abetting even if [defendants] offered persuasive alibis\
• observing in a criminal case, a non-lawyer parent “lacked authority to act as an attorney before the court” on behalf of her minor children
• “The presence of an investigatory motive, even if proven, does not invalidate an otherwise lawful inventory search.”
• “There is no constitutional or statutory right to simultaneously proceed pro se and with the benefit of counsel.”
• “We decline to speculate about Sergeant Russell’s subjective intent. The presence of an investigatory motive, even if proven, does not invalidate an otherwise lawful inventory search.”
• investigatory motive does not invalidate inventory search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).