United States v. Edward Muza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that govern- ment was required to prove that defendant had actual knowledge that target of § 844(i) conspiracy was used in interstate com- merce
• substantial evidence existed where testimony of accomplice corroborated; harmless error found

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).