· 9/15/1995
United States v. Dana Blum, United States of America v. Chester Blum
Citations
- 65 F.3d 1436
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26036
- 1995 WL 545066
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing similar \Hobson's choice\ argument where defendant had been offered \a real alternative\
- “Generally it is Eighth Circuit policy to refuse to consider pro se filings when a party is represented by counsel.”
- \The right to testify on one's own behalf at a criminal trial is derived from the fifth and sixth amendments.\
- adequate inquiry where defendant presented conclusory complaints and court listened to comments from defendant and prosecutor
- defendant who desires to testify must act affirmatively and express to court that desire at appropriate time, or knowing and voluntary waiver is deemed to have occurred.
- general policy is to refuse 1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. pro se filings when party is represented by counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fagg, Henley, Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.