Tenth Circuit· 1/24/2002

United States v. Caballero

Citations

277 F.3d 1235
58 Fed. R. Serv. 1171
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 952
2002 WL 89906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the “failure to show the materiality of [the deported witness’s] lost testimony absolves [the court] of examining the bad faith prong”
holding that testimony from agents as to “relevant, readily-understandable INS procedures or operations of which they had firsthand knowledge” was admissible
noting that witnesses who “summarized business records and client lists and presented them in condensed form ... expressed neither a lay nor an expert opinion”
noting that the Federal Rules of Evidence “distinguish between expert and lay testimony, not between expert and lay witnesses”
noting that witnesses who “summarized business records and client lists and presented them in condensed form . . . expressed neither a lay nor an expert opinion”
explaining that the appellant bears the burden of establishing that “(1) [the] testimony was in fact false, (2) the prosecution knew it to be false, and (3) the testimony was material”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Anderson, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Caballero

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.