Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tenth Circuit· 5/10/1996

United States v. Ivy

Citations

  • 83 F.3d 1266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence that low-level dealer purchased cocaine from members of a cocaine distribution organization, exhibited ties to the organization, and gave advice to its members was “more than enough to link” the dealer to the conspiracy
  • holding that evidence that low-level dealer purchased cocaine from members of a cocaine distribution organization, exhibited ties to the organization, and gave advice to its members was “more than enough to link” the dealer to the conspiracy
  • holding interdependence was shown by fact that one coconspirator received the majority of his supply from another coconspirator and held a prominent position in the supplier’s organization
  • affirming decision to admit evidence offered in violation of Rule 16 after giving defendant time to review it
  • characterizing “third Wicker factor” as essentially irrelevant” because defendant “made it clear she did not want a continuance”
  • rejecting defendants' contention that the government was required to identify the parts of the discovery that would clarify the indictment when the government provided full discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcón, Brorby, McKay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

139 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Ivy

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.