United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Randolph Short, and Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court may approximate amount that laboratory could have produced based upon testimony of DEA chemist and characteristics of laboratory equipment seized
• no violation of due process in questioning cooperative defendant where no inducements, force or misrepresentation involved
• \[A] sentence is final for purposes of § 841 when the conviction is no longer subject to examination on direct appeal.\
• no coercion where defendant on painkillers for serious injuries conversed “freely and intelligently on several subjects” with questioning officers and “never told his questioners that he felt too ill or groggy to answer questions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).