Tenth Circuit· 9/8/1998

United States v. McVeigh

Citations

153 F.3d 1166
50 Fed. R. Serv. 541
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21877
1998 WL 568351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the parties' comprehensive voir dire, including two sereening questionnaires, individual questioning by the court, and questioning by both counsel, produced an impartial jury
noting that 352 prospective jurors were summoned prior to voir dire to fill out an extensive questionnaire in the capital trial of Timothy McVeigh
holding emotional impact testimony harmless because it “could not have affected the outcome of the trial”
noting that “the district court went to great lengths to admonish all potential jurors to ignore the publicity surrounding the issues of the case”
noting that presumed prejudice is 24 “rarely invoked and only in extreme situations”
permitting a family member's testimony regarding a particular coffee cup and wedding ring which served as a constant reminder of the murder and loss of the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Kelly, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named United States v. McVeigh

20 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.