Santiago Tapia v. Robert Tansy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Nor does the fact that there are several conflicting versions [of the facts] affect our determination of credibility as a matter of law.”
• “Contradictions and changes in a witness’s testimony alone do not constitute perjury and do not create an inference, let alone prove, that the prosecution knowingly presented perjured testimony.”
• “Contradictions and changes in a witness’s testimony alone do not constitute perjury and do not create an inference, let alone prove, that the prosecution knowingly presented perjured testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).