Tracey Lust v. Sealy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing the Fourth Circuit’s approach as “inconsistent with the normal analysis of causal issues in tort litigation”
• sustaining jury verdict for plaintiff: “Most important, Penters admitted that he didn’t consider recommending Lust for the Chicago posi- tion because she had children and he didn’t think she’d want to relocate her family, though she hadn’t told him that.”
• “The [cat’s paw] formula was (obviously) not intended to be taken literally.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).