United States v. Antowine Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that mere speculation about the contents of a PSR is insufficient to warrant disclosure under Brady
• noting that “mere speculation that a government file may contain Brady material is not suf- ficient to require a remand for in camera inspection, much less reversal for a new trial”
• collecting cases rejecting the notion that Brady places discovery obligations upon courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).