United States v. Patricia M. Brisk, Lucy A. Beauprey, Isabel M. Cloud, Leona Sanapaw, Barbara Wheelock, James B. Brisk, Jr., and Mary Jane Denny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “distinction between enclave laws and federal laws of nationwide applicability”
• no clear error in calculation of relevant conduct when calculation was based on testimony of a codefendant that the sentencing court found to be credible
• no prima facie case of discrimination where the government used four of six peremptories to exclude women, but there were more women than men on the veni-re
• no due-process violation where majority of Darden factors weighed against finding of unfair trial, 23 including strong evidence of guilt and jury instruction that closing arguments are not evidence
• rejecting identical arguments invoking Quiver and Antelope

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).