United States v. Melvin Morris and Noah A. Spann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of Brady request and refusing in camera inspection where government asserted it had turned over all exculpatory material and defendants offered “nothing but pure conjecture or speculation” that documents contained exculpatory information
• affirming de‐ nial of Brady request and refusing in camera inspection where government asserted it had turned over all exculpatory mate‐ rial and defendants offered “nothing but pure conjecture or speculation” that documents contained exculpatory infor‐ mation
• affirming de‐ nial of Brady request and refusing in camera inspection where government asserted it had turned over all exculpatory mate‐ rial and defendants offered “nothing but pure conjecture or speculation” that documents contained exculpatory infor‐ mation
• “[I]t is well established that a trial judge’s assessment of relative probative value and unfair prejudice is generally accorded great deference because of his first- hand exposure to the evidence and his familiarity with the course of the proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).