· 1/14/1992
United States v. Michael John Canino, James Gilbert Marcum, John G. Flynn, and David Leonard Malkin
Citations
- 949 F.2d 928
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] bill of particulars is not required when information necessary for a defendant’s defense can be obtained through ‘some other satisfactory form.’”
- open file form of discovery obviated need for bill of particulars
- rejecting argument that unanimity instruction was required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Eschbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.