United States v. Carletos E. Hardamon, Also Known as Cj

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that during the sentencing phase of a criminal proceeding “the rules of evidence do not apply and the sentencing judge is free to consider a wide range of evidence including hearsay.”
• defendant made no showing that a district court’s credibility determination was “exceedingly improbable; she merely presents a contradictory statement of facts. That is not enough.”
• defendant made no showing that a district court's credibility determination was \exceedingly improbable; she merely presents a contradictory statement of facts. That is not enough.\
• defendant made no showing that a district court’s credibility determination was “exceedingly improbable; she merely presents a contradictory statement of facts. That is not enough.”
• defendant made no showing that a district court’s credibility determination was “exceedingly improbable; she merely presents a contradictory statement of facts. That is not enough.”
• defendant made no showing that a district court’s credibility determination was “exceedingly improbable; she merely presents a contradictory statement of facts. That is not enough.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).