United States v. Anthony Gault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing de novo whether a defendant’s Sixth Amendment confrontation rights were violated by cross-examination restrictions
• no constitutional violation for a 7% absolute disparity
• 5.74%, and 7.0% absolute disparities insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).