Tenth Circuit· 4/16/1998
United States v. Anthony Gault
Citations
- 141 F.3d 1399
- 49 Fed. R. Serv. 279
- 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1916
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7491
- 1998 WL 177982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing de novo whether a defendant’s Sixth Amendment confrontation rights were violated by cross-examination restrictions
- no constitutional violation for a 7% absolute disparity
- 5.74%, and 7.0% absolute disparities insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldock, Barrett, Logan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. OrangeTenth Circuit· 2006-05-02· cited 160×
- United States v. Michael D. ShinaultTenth Circuit· 1998-07-08· cited 88×
- United States v. MullinsTenth Circuit· 2010-07-29· cited 76×
- United States v. PowellTenth Circuit· 2000-09-21· cited 74×
- United States v. Gary Joseph BindleyTenth Circuit· 1998-10-13· cited 54×
- United States v. OliverTenth Circuit· 2001-11-14· cited 49×
- United States v. Timothy ByrneTenth Circuit· 1999-04-06· cited 45×
- United States v. GarciaTenth Circuit· 1999-07-07· cited 44×
- United States v. Eric Stuart HarfstTenth Circuit· 1999-02-16· cited 36×
- United States v. Rafael RodriguezThird Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 26×
- United States v. GeamesTenth Circuit· 2005-11-08· cited 21×
- United States v. GreenTenth Circuit· 2006-01-27· cited 20×
- Washington v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2008-06-23· cited 20×
- State v. HollandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-07-21· cited 19×
- United States v. McGuireTenth Circuit· 1999-12-21· cited 18×
- United States v. HollowayTenth Circuit· 2016-06-20· cited 18×
- Joseph Howell v. Superintendent Rockview SCIThird Circuit· 2019-09-17· cited 18×
- United States v. BarlowE.D. New York· 2010-08-05· cited 14×
- United States v. JohnTenth Circuit· 2017-02-27· cited 12×
- People v. Man Hao LuongColorado Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 12×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 2,373×
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,507×
- Valerio Ernest Miranda v. Thomas Cooper, Superintendent, and Frank Gunter, (Gunther) Sic, Director, D.O.C.Tenth Circuit· 1992-06-17· cited 248×
- United States v. TestTenth Circuit· 1976-11-12· cited 188×
- United States v. SinclairTenth Circuit· 1997-03-26· cited 130×
- United States v. Alphonso Pedraza, United States of America v. Peter Brent Irelan, United States of America v. Enrique PedrazaTenth Circuit· 1994-06-30· cited 117×
- United States of America, and v. Doloras Contreras, and Cross-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1997-03-11· cited 104×
- United States v. A. Ruiz-CastroTenth Circuit· 1996-08-12· cited 84×
- United States v. Raymond Eugene BadgerFifth Circuit· 1991-02-14· cited 82×
- United States v. Maria Carmen Castillo De Gudino and Nicolas Gudino-OrtegaSeventh Circuit· 1984-12-28· cited 60×
- United States v. David CaruthTenth Circuit· 1991-04-16· cited 51×
- The United States of America v. Terry YazzieTenth Circuit· 1982-01-25· cited 47×
- United States v. Antonio Arredondo-SantosTenth Circuit· 1990-08-21· cited 40×
- United States v. Douglas G. TelmanTenth Circuit· 1994-06-30· cited 33×
- United States v. Lorenzo Alberto Sukiz-GradoTenth Circuit· 1994-04-26· cited 31×
- United States v. Corley AyersTenth Circuit· 1996-05-22· cited 27×
- United States v. Anthony GaultTenth Circuit· 1996-07-12· cited 26×
- United States v. GaultD. New Mexico· 1997-04-01· cited 3×
Other cases named United States v. Anthony Gault
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.