Skip to main content
· 2/14/1991

United States v. Raymond Eugene Badger

Citations

  • 925 F.2d 101
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234
  • 1991 WL 16532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that fact that defendant \was ably and effectively\ represented by counsel throughout proceedings supported district court's refusal to permit plea withdrawal
  • holding no abuse of discretion by “district judge [that] did not make specific findings on each of the Carr factors”
  • stating that even if factors of government prejudice, inconvenience to court, and waste of judicial resources weighed in Badger's favor, \they do not tip the scales to the extent necessary to find an abuse of discretion\
  • “[W]e did not intend to require the district court to make a specific finding as to each of the seven factors every time a defendant requests to withdraw a guilty plea.”
  • delay of three weeks weighed against withdrawal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politz, Williams, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.