Tenth Circuit· 3/26/1997

United States v. Sinclair

Citations

109 F.3d 1527
46 Fed. R. Serv. 871
1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 5835
1997 WL 137939

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding the defendant could have reasonably anticipated the relevance of certain documents, which remained constant throughout the trial, and sought to obtain them before trial
noting that expenses associated with the underlying perjury offense should not form the basis for the upward adjustment
stating that the court’s allowance of the out-of-court statements indicated it found the witness’s testimony sufficiently credible to establish the required elements
upholding district court’s determination that the government’s re-interviewing and recalling of the two witnesses who had been induced to perjure themselves constituted a substantial expenditure
discussing scope of § 2J1.3(b)(2) and the meaning of “substantial governmental or court resources” in application note 1
refusing to foreclose use of the possibility standard in such circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Henry, Briscoe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Sinclair

24 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.