United States of America, and v. Doloras Contreras, and Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a similar claim based on the absence of evidence concerning the racial composition of the district
• stating that, in light of the Act’s specific in-court requirement for excusals under only one clause of § 1866(c), “we can logically infer that it may be permissible for a court to exclude a juror for hardship or bias prior to voir dire”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).