The United States of America v. Terry Yazzie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “novel proposition” that voluntary intoxication would not be a defense to substantive charge, but would be “available as a partial defense, effective in conjunction with others,” including the defense of self-defense
• “There is no question that Indians constitute a distinctive group in the community[.]”
• treating 4.29% absolute disparity and 46.3% comparative disparity as insufficient
• no constitutional violation for a 4.29% absolute disparity
• no constitutional violation for a 4.29% absolute disparity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).