United States v. Geames

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that statutory Booker error was preserved by Blakely objection
• “[T]he defendant has the burden of demonstrating [the three elements of a Brady -41- claim].”
• “We ... refrain from being placed in the zone of speculation and conjecture about what the district court would have done had it applied the Guidelines in an advisory capacity.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he defendant has the burden of demonstrating [the three elements of a Brady- claim].”
• “Because Defendant made a Blakely objec- tion at sentencing, Defendant preserved his Booker argument for this appeal.”
• “We . . . refrain from being placed in the zone of speculation and conjecture about what the district court would have done had it applied the Guidelines in an advisory capacity.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).