Skip to main content
· 6/22/1987

United States v. Martin Roman

Citations

  • 822 F.2d 261
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We can see no logical reason to apply a different rule to a superseding indictment simply because it is filed sooner, while the first indictment is still pending.”
  • “We can see no logical reason to apply a different rule to a superseding indictment simply because it is filed sooner, while the first indictment is still pending.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Pratt, Altimari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.