Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/30/2009

Trotter v. State

Citations

200 P.3d 1236
288 Kan. 112
2009 Kan. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that direct appeal counsel was ineffective for not raising the issue of multiplicity and reversing the multiplicitous conviction on appeal of Trotter's K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion
applying Martis to find premeditated murder conviction multiplicitous with capital murder conviction based on the killing of more than one individual
noting distinction between raising an issue for the first time on appeal and raising the issue for the first time in a motion under K.S.A. 60-1507
discussing general rule that “issues not raised before a district court, including constitutional grounds for reversal, cannot be raised for the first time on appeal,” and exceptions, in the context of a § 60-1507 motion
claim that multiple sentences arose from single wrongful act and violated Double Jeopardy Clause does not establish that sentence is illegal
claim that multiple sentences arose from single wrongful act and violated Double Jeopardy Clause does not establish that sentence is illegal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.