Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/6/2010

Holt v. State

Citations

232 P.3d 848
290 Kan. 491
2010 Kan. LEXIS 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the trial court may hear a second or successive § 60-1507 motion in the proper circumstances
holding that issues raised in K.S.A. 60-1507 petition but not briefed or challenged on appeal are deemed waived or abandoned
finding mov-ant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances that justified consideration of his fourth 60-1507 motion
recognizing district court’s inherent authority to “manage litigation”
recognizing inherent authority to control docket
“Blanket prohibitions, however, would deny a party’s future access to the courts and constitute an over extension of the inherent authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.